The NSA data dragnet implementation was a widely
disputed ethical issue. I feel personally that the privacy freedoms I give up in
order to prevent terrorism are acceptable. My phone calls from my wife to
remind me to pick up bread or milk from the store aren’t all that interesting
anyhow. However, I will admit that if the dragnet information was published as
being simply a means for the government to track every ones actions, I would
feel it an immoral invasion of privacy. For me, the price benefit of
anti-terror netting makes me feel safe, even though the entire system has a “Big
Brother” feel to it. “If Congress fails to act, several key provisions of the
law would expire, including the bulk collection; a provision allowing so-called
roving wiretaps, which the FBI uses for criminals who frequently switch cell
phones; and a third that makes it easier to obtain a warrant to target a ‘lone
wolf’ terror suspect who has no provable links to a terrorist organization”
(Pergram, 2015). Although civil liberties are being sacrificed for this law to
proceed, I do feel that the greater good is prevailing and we must place a
higher importance on life over privacy.
Reference
Pergram, C. (2015, May 20). DOJ warns NSA data dragnet
program could lapse amid Hill impasse. Retrieved May 21, 2015, from
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/20/doj-warns-nsa-may-have-to-wind-down-bulk-collection-rand-paul-launches-lengthy/
No comments:
Post a Comment